SAM' SOAP BOX - A CONSERVATIVES POINT OF VIEW

DISCLAIMER: THE OPINIONS ON THIS PAGE ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF SAM AND ARE OPINIONS ONLY AND AS SUCH ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE 1st AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

This is a page dedicated to not being politically correct. I make no apologies. I feel there is way too much of that today. If you are easily offended, do not read this "Blog". It is full of political and social observations and comments. I am in my own way, attempting to educate all who want to know how our government works and how we can regain control so we can remain a government that is "Of The People, By the People, and For the People.

NOTE: I will not respond to or entertain any comments that are rude or disrespectful. Get your FACTS together before you comment then present them in a logical articulate fashion. Check out the sites I have include below. They are worth a look. This is a Living Document so please check back often. Click on titles to go to storys that I feel is relevant to the cause.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

COULD THE EXPLOSION OF THE YELLOWSTONE CALDERA BE THE CATASTROPHE THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS PREPARING FOR?

Could the explosion of the Yellowstone caldera be the catastrophe that the government has been secretly planning for? Is the eruption so certain that the government has set up relocation sites, planned the deployment of 20,000 troops, bought hundreds of thousands grave liners and pre-positioned them all over the United States? Well, if one was to put 2 and 2 together, taking into consideration all the current conspiracy therories about certain occurrences here in the states, coupled with the end of the Mayan calendar in 2012 and the now ongoing flurry of earthquakes in Yellowstone, this therory is a plausable as any. Click on the title to go to the video. On that same page you will find associated web site links, one to the USGS. I urge you to check them out.

1 comment:

Ted said...

CHALLENGE (with answer), CAN ANYONE PROVE THIS WRONG?:–

1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.

2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.

3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution (that both parents must be citizens of USA) co-authored by BHO.

4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.

5. Since the fact of BHO’s dad being Kenyan/British not in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.

6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.

7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

ANSWER TO ABOVE CHALLENGE

IF, when counting the electoral votes, Congress WERE TO find by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American) — fails to qualify as President, Biden would become the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) AND THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR DEFERRAL TO THE SUPREME COURT to enjoin Obama’s inauguration relegating Biden to being merely Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President were duly determined.

(The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, would seem obvious.)